Harris again

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Sam Harris responds to Andrew Sullivan here, where he deals with "the question of whether a given religious doctrine-like the doctrine of the Resurrection-is true (or likely to be):"

As I've pointed out before, the truth or falsity of a proposition is one thing; the psychological/social effect of believing it is quite another. It seems to me that most religious people ignore this distinction. In fact, there is a powerful incentive to do so, because to focus on the plausibility of a doctrine, without being beguiled by its consolations, forces a person to confront just how dubious most religious propositions are. The long-range interest of maintaining one's faith (and reaping its consolations) generally overwhelms every present temptation to honestly evaluate whether or not a specific article of faith is likely to be true.

Harris ends his missive with a list of unanswered questions which Sullivan has either deftly sidestepped or outright ignored. I would be happy to see Sullivan--or any other believer--answer them, as they lie at the core of my own personal rejection of religion.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.cognitivedissident.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2431

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by cognitivedissident published on March 24, 2007 3:39 PM.

idiots for intervention? was the previous entry in this blog.

hiatus? vacation? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.031