angry Democrats

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

This Washington Post article on anger in the left-wing blogosphere has generated some commentary online; Amanda Marcotte at Pandagon has a great response:

The sane response of people who are actually living in the world to infuriating things is to be infuriated. So being called angry can be taken as a huge compliment, since it means you are sane and you aren’t a sociopath and you actually love life and hate that others are trying to fuck things up.

The “angry” frame is a no-win situation for the Democrats, because a lack of anger means (according the mainstream conservative media) that they’re not energized enough to win; an excess of anger means that they’re unhinged, unstable, and unelectable. The manufactured “Dean Scream” is the most obvious example, but there’s a double standard in place that never allows the “too angry” charge to work against the GOP. Yellin’ Zell Miller wasn’t criticized for his vein-popping display of histrionics at the 2004 GOP convention, and the ever-infuriated Christianist preachers receive respectful hearings throughout the media.

I await a companion piece from WaPo examining the verbal vitriol emanating from right-wing websites; FreeRepublic would be a good starting point, although there are many others.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL:

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by cognitivedissident published on April 17, 2006 10:05 AM.

invisible families was the previous entry in this blog.

the decider is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives


  • About
  • Contact
OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.031