conservative in-fighting

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

It’s been a good day so far: Andrew Sullivan critiqued the Bushevik strain of big-government conservatism at a Cato luncheon yesterday, along with fellow conservative writer Bruce Bartlett. This Washington Post article by Dana Milbank has the details. Bartlett, author of the newly released “Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy,” commented that "If Bush were running today against Bill Clinton, I'd vote for Clinton." Sullivan’s remarks weren’t gentle, either:

"You have to understand the people in this administration have no principles. […] Any principles that get in the way of the electoral map have to be dispensed with."

Sullivan blogged about the luncheon yesterday:

By hitching the Republican base to Christianism, and by legitimizing massive spending for a Republican, he [Bush] has been able to dispense with much of what conservatism once meant. Limited government? Yeah, right. Balanced budgets? A joke. Individual liberty? Only if you're in the Middle East. Huge tax increases? Just you wait. They're now inevitable. A welfare state bigger and more intrusive than Ted Kennedy could dream of? That will be Bush's legacy. It will take conservatism a generation to recover its bearings.

Atrios, while agreeing with Sullivan’s critique of Bush, demolishes his reminiscing about the “Thatcher-Reagan legacy that many of us grew up to love and support” this way:

I know the myth of the Reagan era is one of those consensus things impervious to fact but lets go to the numbers.

In 1981 when Reagan took office, as a percent of GDP federal outlays were 22.2% of GDP. When he left, in 1989, federal outlays were an incredibly shrunken 21.2%. Revenues went from 19.6% to 18.4%, which is why we were blessed with those lovely Reagan deficits. […] …the Reagan era was not a magical age of tiny government and ponies.

I suppose mentioning illegally trading arms for hostages, supporting nun-killing Central American death squads, the Marine incident in Lebanon, and of course the incredible number of Reagan administration officials who were indicted/convicted would be a wee bit too much.

That’s a lot of myth-busting for one day, and really whets my appetite for Sullivan’s upcoming book: The Conservative Soul: How We Lost It; How to Get It Back.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.cognitivedissident.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/128

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by cognitivedissident published on March 8, 2006 12:17 PM.

South Dakota’s new logo was the previous entry in this blog.

Jack Abramoff in Vanity Fair is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages

  • About
  • Contact
OpenID accepted here Learn more about OpenID
Powered by Movable Type 5.031